As I was testing this on my side I created the rule with no options then went back in and changed them after. I did this without thinking because I always do this due to what I thought were bugs in the past. More of a reflex than thinking about it. Completely forgot about it - at least consciously. Good to know it's actually a documented bug though.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Lawrence Sent: January-15-10 1:18 PM To: Tony Graziano Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipx-users] User Forwarding On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 13:10 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > I got it working. The issue was the job to create the auto attendant > failed. > > > File replication: autoattendants.xml>failed. > > > I had to delete and start over. It didn't like the fact that I defined > options, etc., before hitting apply the first time in order to create. It's actually a special case of an existing bug... if you don't fill in all the boxes when defining an auto-attendant, it creates an invalid xml configuration file, and the validation check prevents the replication. The error reporting is (as you discovered) terrible. I don't remember the number, but it's there somewhere... _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
