On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 11:09 -0600, [email protected] wrote: > >> Might there be some way of having two then, which are kept in sync? > >> > > That would be a wonderfully difficult software engineering problem! > > Why is that? > What about using a shared mapped storage for both sipx instances so > that each can find vm's. Then, a way of syncing up vm notices on the > two sipx instances so that if a user logs into either, they can get at > their vm.
And a system of locks so that if one caller is leaving a VM for ext. 123 using system A, and another caller is leaving a VM for ext. 123 using system B, neither system corrupts the changes to storage that the other one is making... The problem is one of a fully distributed and redundant database. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
