Hi. Just a quick reply...

Tony Graziano wrote:
> 
> sipx is not designed to be a firewall. 

This has nothing to do with firewalls. We run Cisco firewalls and they 
work quite well. :) The second interface is strictly for management, 
monitoring, imaging, network storage, etc. Typically, the second (and 
sometimes third) interface is connected to a non-routable network and/or 
VPN. This is an extremely common network topology so I'm surprised that 
the sipx project hasn't fully corrected the shortcoming already, 
especially since the platform is directed at enterprise deployments.

I might add that our offices are interconnected across VPNs. That gets 
rid of any requirement for excessive public ip consumption and also 
alleviates the need to configure NAT for our SIP traffic. As long as we 
can bridge the public/private VOIP traffic at our data center we're good 
to go.

While the devs might not like the criticism... I think if it's true that 
Nortel resolved the issue for SCS500 then I'm not the only one that 
thinks this is a design flaw.

Also, just because someone mentions "Asterisk" on this list, it isn't 
meant to invite personal opinion about the platform's merits; it's a 
widely deployed application that works quite well in installations up to 
a certain size and it certainly has proven to be quite flexible over the 
years. Indeed, the latest SwitchVox release (4.5) raises the bar by 
providing an even greater integration with Polycom hardware. Personally? 
I just can't stand the architecture of Asterisk but that's only me being 
a nerd.

It's been great seeing the sipx project evolve over time but so far it 
seems that I'm continuing to have to hold off on a deployment because 
one feature or another is missing. It's awesome that there's a roadmap 
(more than most projects have) but then I'm puzzled by some of the 
priorities...

-mark

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to