Additionally the alg on the cisco might cause an issue. Again, I don't think
you can get there from here.
============================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: [email protected]
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427
Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: Hiral Patel <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
<[email protected]>; Tony Graziano
<[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Dwayne Kee <[email protected]>; Gabor Paller
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tue Feb 02 20:57:01 2010
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?
That is outside of my skill set, but I was advised against attempting
something similar when I ran into the issue. We translate 5060 to 5080 on
traffic from the Verizon SBC. That has worked fine for us. They were not
able to alter the port for a particular customer either.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: "Hiral Patel" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 01:46:12
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
Tony Graziano<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Cc: Dwayne Kee<[email protected]>; Gabor
Paller<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?
Thanks for your input, and that is my option two - the Cisco router
which terminates the SIP trunk has feature called ALG (application level
gateway) running to handle NAT from LAN to WAN. I don't want to break
that, I may test this and see what happens.
Do you know if my original suggestion will work? If not why?
Hiral Patel, Operations Manager
OnRelay
Elizabeth House | 39 York Road, London SE1 7NQ, UK | +44 (0)
2079028138| [email protected] | www.onrelay.com |
This electronic message transmission contains information from OnRelay,
Ltd., that may be confidential or privileged. The information is
intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not
authorised. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information or any attachment, is prohibited. If you have received this
electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by
electronic mail ([email protected]) and delete this message, along with
any attachments, from your computer. Registered in England No 04006093 |
Registered Office 1st Floor, 236 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8HL
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 03 February 2010 12:42
To: Hiral Patel; [email protected]; Tony Graziano;
[email protected]
Cc: Dwayne Kee; Gabor Paller; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?
If you have control of the LAN, ca you add a router that can do a port
translation? I had a similar issue.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: "Hiral Patel" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 01:37:16
To: Tony Graziano<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Cc: Dwayne Kee<[email protected]>; Gabor
Paller<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?
Hey Tony,
Thanks for replying so fast, I can not get a new ITSP unfortunately so I
have to find a solution!
I should have mentioned that the SIP trunk I have is a dedicated WAN
link into the Tier 1 Operator network the network side is connect to a
Acme Packet SBC (its like a standard product they have so they are not
able to make an configure change without months of planning and risk
analysis. And sending port is definitely a no no anyway!
I have full control over the LAN but the problem is I can not change the
incoming port from the trunk as mentioned, I would like to understand
why my proposed solution will not work, can you please help with that?
On paper it seems very straight forward, so from your input I will
adjust my design systematically until I come to the perfect solution
which fits my requirements.
Regards,
Hiral Patel, Operations Manager
OnRelay
Elizabeth House | 39 York Road, London SE1 7NQ, UK | +44 (0)
2079028138| [email protected] | www.onrelay.com |
This electronic message transmission contains information from OnRelay,
Ltd., that may be confidential or privileged. The information is
intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not
authorised. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information or any attachment, is prohibited. If you have received this
electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by
electronic mail ([email protected]) and delete this message, along with
any attachments, from your computer. Registered in England No 04006093 |
Registered Office 1st Floor, 236 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8HL
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 03 February 2010 12:22
To: Hiral Patel; [email protected]
Cc: Dwayne Kee; Gabor Paller; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?
Your best option is to get a new itsp. Then use a real firewall, your
hands
are REALLY tied.
You would have to run 2 instances of sipxbridge with 2 different public
ip
addresses (one for remote users, the other for trunking). Since that
means
firewall changes you can't make, you are STUCK.
Fire the ITSP, then the incapable firewall manager and get REAL
replacements.
Plainly said, you can't get there from here. Good luck.
============================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: [email protected]
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427
Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
<[email protected]>
To: M. Ranganathan <[email protected]>
Cc: Dwayne Kee <[email protected]>; Gabor Paller
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tue Feb 02 20:16:01 2010
Subject: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?
Hello All,
Purpose:
Need to enable SipXecs bridge to solve lack of REFER support on SIP
trunk.
Problem:
1. SIP trunk provider has very strict rules about changing any
configuration on any component that they manage. The SIP trunk comes
with a Cisco 2801 router which is managed by the Operator and the port
they signal on is 5060, this is a problem because all requests from the
trunk are bypassing SipXecs bridge which listens on port 5080 therefore
REFER can not be influenced.
2. SIP trunk Operator will not change port on trunk
3. SIP trunk Operator will not change config on Router, so I can not do
any NAT as recommended here:
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SIP_Trunking_with_sipXecs:_Overvi
ew_and_Configuration#2._Configure_SipXbridge
4. Do not want to change SipXecs internal port to some else, sounds
dangerous and messy
5. Do not want to try another sip trunk provider
My solution to the problem: (please provide feedback and answer my
question below)
1. Configure two physical sipX components
(a) sipXbridge(only) IP Add: 192.168.0.1 Port 5060
(b) sipXpbx(proxy) IP add: 192.168.0.99 port 5060
2. Configure (b) sipXpbx with provider gateway address 123.123.123.234
3. Configure (b) sipXpbx with route under gateway config to
SipXbridge(a)IP add: 192.168.0.1
4. Configure SipXbridge (a) to receive/send signalling from provider
gateway and pass to/from (b) sipXpbx
Questions:
1. Will this solve my problems?
2. is my suggestion possible?
3. if so, how do I configure sipXbridge?
4. if so, are there any draw backs that you are aware of by implementing
this design?
Your help would be much appreciated.
Regards
Hiral Patel, Operations Manager
OnRelay
Elizabeth House | 39 York Road, London SE1 7NQ, UK | +44 (0)
2079028138| [email protected] | www.onrelay.com |
This electronic message transmission contains information from OnRelay,
Ltd., that may be confidential or privileged. The information is
intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not
authorised. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information or any attachment, is prohibited. If you have received this
electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by
electronic mail ([email protected]) and delete this message, along with
any attachments, from your computer. Registered in England No 04006093 |
Registered Office 1st Floor, 236 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8HL
-----Original Message-----
From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 27 January 2010 05:20
To: Hiral Patel
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] How to map external 5060 to internal 5080
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Hiral Patel <[email protected]>
wrote:
My SipXecs PBX is connected an unauthenticated sip trunk for which I
need to
enable SipXecs bridge to be able to work around the lack of REFER
support on
the sip trunk.
The sip trunk sends to sipX on port 5060 therefore any incoming
dialogue
bypasses sipXbridge and hence outgoing signalling also are bypassing
sipXbridge for the same dialogue.
What I would like to know is if it is possible to re-configure sipX so
that
sipXbridge listens on 5060 and sipX listens on 5080?
No you should not configure it this way. You should configure it as
follows:
1. Allow sipx proxy server to continue to listen on port 5060.
2. Allow sipxbridge to continue to listen on port 5080 ( both of these
are defaults ).
3. Set the public port in the sipxbridge configuration page to port
5060. See
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SIP_Trunking_with_sipXecs:_Overvi
ew_and_Configuration#2._Configure_SipXbridge
4. Map your NAT to send WAN packets arriving at 5060 to port 5080 on
the host where sipxbridge is configured and vice versa.
Ranga
I understand there is a way to map external 5060 to internal 5080, but
I am
not sure how to do this, can anyone help?
Also, if the above is possible does it have any implications e.g.
Ranga
mentioned that remote worker maybe effected?
Regards,
Hiral Patel,
OnRelay
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
