If you give them real extensions does it work right? It may be something in the softphone.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Canfield Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 7:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [sipx-users] X-lite outgoing caller ID issues. Hey guys, I have an interesting situation using X-lite 3.0 soft-phones and the 4.0 Beta. Before I start gathering sip traces, I thought I'd see if this is the expected behavior... 1 - Created soft-phone users. Sation01, Station02... 2 - Registered soft-phones manually (i.e. no phone provisioned for these users.) 3 - Everything works fine...except outgoing caller ID is '01' for Sation01 and '02' for Station02...etc. I've tried changing outgoing caller ID on the phone groups and each user individually without success. All the Polycoms work fine. Is this expected behavior when there is no phone assigned to a user? GW - Patton 4960 sipXecs - 4.0.4 -- Jim Canfield Emstar Solutions, LLC Phone: 918-851-2633 http://emstar.com ..IT is about service. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
