I'm sorry to ask this but here goes anyway: Can someone provide a link to the discussion of extensive testing? I've searched the archives and can't seem to find it.
Ken -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of M. Ranganathan Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 7:30 PM To: Matt White Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 250 Concurrent Calls? Much more extensive testing was later performed by our test group and the results were posted somewhere on this list or the development list. You can check out the source code and look in the design document as well. Ranga On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Matt White <[email protected]> wrote: > I think your asking for the "250" number from the wiki be qualified. > > Ranga had does some testing a while back and posted some results in the > mailing list. A quick google shows this thread from back in 2008: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00038.html > > -Matt > >>>> "Ken Fulmer" <[email protected]> 03/04/10 6:42 PM >>> > I appreciate your responses. However, I feel like I'm not explaining myself > very well. > > When you say the system is highly scalable, are there any numbers / specs > that show just how scalable it is? Does the 250 number for concurrent calls > not include RTP streams? > > Basically, we need to understand the numbers. Does any documentation exist > for this? > > Thanks, > > Ken > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Graziano [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 5:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 250 Concurrent Calls? > > Not necessarily. The system is highly scalable. One bridge makes a single > point of failure. > > HA is a master/distributed but not a master/slave model. Even so, it is more > preferable (to me anyway) to make any site or group an "island" when it > comes to communications. I find it easier to troubleshoot, plan and operate. > People are always trying to do things with HA and really assume how it all > works. > > Good luck, sounds like a lot of fun. > ============================ > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: [email protected] > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > Fax: 434.984.8427 > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ken Fulmer <[email protected]> > To: 'Tony Graziano' <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Thu Mar 04 18:13:25 2010 > Subject: RE: [sipx-users] 250 Concurrent Calls? > > I might be misunderstanding the capabilities of the system. Can't we use two > servers in HA (primary and secondary) with a third as a sipXbridge? > > I didn't realize each server had to run the proxy services. However, the > third server wouldn't have any phones attached - it would be used for PSTN > call routing. > > Is this a configuration that makes a cluster more scalable? > > Ken > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Graziano [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 4:55 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 250 Concurrent Calls? > > Understand. I'm not sure how "standalone" it will be. For example, right now > ANY server in HA must run a proxy. Voicemail is another that is not > standalone. Sipxbridge has nothing to do with internal calls, just itsp > connections. > > Once you get a handle on the requirements and they make sense on how they > were arrived at, post back. > ============================ > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: [email protected] > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > Fax: 434.984.8427 > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ken Fulmer <[email protected]> > To: 'Tony Graziano' <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Thu Mar 04 17:43:29 2010 > Subject: RE: [sipx-users] 250 Concurrent Calls? > > I'm trying to understand how the 250 number was generated. > > > > We'd want to use a dedicated server for the sipXbridge. > > > > Ken > > > > From: Tony Graziano [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 4:15 PM > To: Ken Fulmer > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 250 Concurrent Calls? > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Ken Fulmer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > The admin guide says the following: > > > > A single sipXrelay instance can comfortably handle 250 concurrent calls > within acceptable limits of jitter and delay without becoming a bottleneck. > > > > Does anyone know what server specs are required to get this number of calls > through the server comfortably? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ken Fulmer > > > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > > > That's kind of an ambiguous question. It really depends on the roles being > used for the server. > > > > sipxbridge is used for ITSP trunking. If you are also going to have remote > users you need to ask a similar question about media relay I think. > Voicemail/AA/CDR/ACD roles also play a role, as does configuration, and > whether or not this is part of a HA system or not. bandwidth might also play > a part here too. > > > > If you can better describe what you expect your environment or use case, you > can expect better guidance. > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
