I recently had a problem with voip.ms exactly like this, the problem was that 
something in their infrastructure or downstream just assumes that the 'dynamic' 
RTP code for telephony events (DTMF) is 101. It isn't consistent and DTMF on 
calls to the same destinations work or don't work apparently randomly. I tried 
calling a local pots number and typing DTMF and sure enough sometimes I would 
hear the tones and sometimes there was total silence on the receiving end. 

SipXecs defaults polycom phones to use 127 instead of 101 (because polycom uses 
127 as the default).

Linksys/Cisco SPAxxx devices suffer from the same problem, they let you 
negotiate 127 (as an FXO from a Polycom) but then just work as if 101 was 
selected.

What solved it for me and made voip.ms 100% reliable wrt DTMF was to switch the 
polycoms to use 101. I put in a jira/patch for this but since Polycom thinks 
127 is a good default its unlikely the default will be changed in the sipXecs 
polycom plugin.

-Eric

On Mar 5, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Burden, Mike wrote:

> Good afternoon,
>  
> Most of the time (about 75%) we can call a Customer/Vendor/etc that has an 
> automated attendant, and we are able to make selections or choose extensions 
> using DTMF on the keypad.
>  
> Once in a while, though, we make a call and are not able to make a selection 
> unless we wait until the auto-attendant on the receiving end finishes its 
> spiel.
>  
>  
> Since our configuration isn’t changing between calls, and I assume that our 
> ITSP isn’t changing configurations, I believe that DTMF is configured 
> correctly in sipXecs (or else it wouldn’t work right 75% of the time.)
>  
>  
> My theory is that the ITSP must have a number of FXO/FXS devices to connect 
> VOIP calls into the POTS system.   I’m guessing that they may vary somewhat 
> in the quality of the DTMF tones they generate, and that different calls 
> being routed to different FXO/FXS devices explains why sometimes DTMF works 
> fine and sometimes it doesn’t.
>  
>  
> Could I be onto something here, or is there a flaw in my reasoning?
>  
>  
>  
> Mike Burden
> Lynk Systems, Inc
> e-mail: [email protected]   
> Phone: 616-532-4985
>  
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to