Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:34 AM To: Scott Lawrence Cc: Ken Fulmer; [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge Redundancy
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Scott Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 11:19 -0500, M. Ranganathan wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Ken Fulmer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > The design doc mentioned one sipXbridge per cluster. The link above suggests >> > two can be used in a HA setup. Can anyone clarify? >> > >> > >> > >> > http://www.sipfoundry.org/component/content/article/29-test-read-more-link-p age.html >> >> >> Sipxbridge distributes inbound calls to relays using DNS SRV weighting measures. >> >> That is, if you have the common case of 50% assigned to each record, >> the calls will be routed to one or other relay with probability of >> 1/2. > > I don't think that's what he meant. He was asking if you can have more > than one instance of sipXbridge. > > I believe so, but they are _not_ set up so that you can make them > identical. You can use one sipXbridge for one connection, and another > for another connection... but I'm not 100% sure I've got the constraints > correct. You are correct. Specifically, if you want two sipxbridge instances, 1. Specify different external ports for each. 2. Make sure you do not register with the same ITSP for both instances for the same account (unless your ITSP allows that -- and few do). That is, the accounts should not overlap but sipx will not check that for you. It is the responsibility of the system administrator. Regards Ranga > > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
