On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 17:12 -0500, [email protected] wrote: > >The sensitivity to packet loss or other network effects (packet > >reordering or jitter, for example) are highly dependent on the > >capabilities of the endpoints. There are many different strategies for > >compensating for these things, some of which are quite sophisticated and > >leverage the way your brain fills in sensory gaps and compensates for > >background noise. > > Sure, the brain would fill in small missing parts of conversation and > of course, we've all gotten used to some of the crummy voip services > out there which have a great deal of drop outs. We all want perfectly > optimized connections but sometimes can't get them so wondered if > there was any tolerance. > > Mostly, I wondered about the fact that since media isn't traveling > through sipx once a call is established, I thought, hoped, that > because of this specifically, that there might be some give.
Because sipXecs touches the media only as much as is absolutely required (which often means not at all), the system at least does not add to the problems. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
