> > Just wanted to update everyone that I did get it working. > > It was the SIP ALG on my Cisco router. > > Here was the fix: > > no ip nat service sip tcp port 5060 > no ip nat service sip udp port 5060 >
Thank you for sharing your path to success. If you could share with us your Cisco router model then I could add it to the (currently empty) router list with ALGs we maintain in our Wiki. > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:43 AM, JOLY, ROBERT (ROBERT) > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> To me that looks like whatever router you are using in > front of the > >> phones is doing NAT compensation via a SIP ALG. > >> Sometimes it's difficult to disable the ALG, depending on > the router. > > > > I concur with you. Either that or the phones have STUN enabled. > > > > Does x-lite work properly when you put it in the same > private network as your polycoms? If it does then this is a > clue that Polycom is doing something like STUN. If it > doesn't then it points to your router. > > > > One more thing. You say that your x-lite registration looks like: > > > <sip:[email protected]:28436;rinstance=b83c40108342c5fb;x-sipX-privcontact > > =74.2.3.4%3A28436> > > > > This does not appear normal to me. Basically, the contact > should show the public IP address of the x-lite whereas the > x-sipX-privcontact should show the private IP addresss. In > your case, they are the same thing - this is indicative of > some sort of misconfiguration but not sure where. > > > > Please review > http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuserV4r0/Remote+User+NA > T+Traversal to make sure your setup is sound. Keep us posted. > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Could you post some information about what networking > equipment you > >> are using, particularly what firewall you're using on both sides. > >> > >> [email protected] wrote: > >> > Hello all; > >> > > >> > I am playing around with setting up my test phones > (Polycom 650 and > >> > Polycom 321) to connect to a SIPx server with a public > IP, and the > >> > phones are behind NAT. > >> > > >> > I have enabled NAT Traversal under Internet Calling, and I have > >> > removed all subnets from Intranet subnets. > >> > > >> > IP of Server : 74.1.1.1 > >> > IP of Phones : 192.168.1.130 and 131 External IP of NAT > : 74.2.3.4 > >> > > >> > I am seeing the phones regsitered with the nonat option. > >> > > >> > > >> > sip:[email protected]<sip:[email protected]:1178;transport=tcp;x-sipX-nonat>7 > >> 0 > >> > 8 sipxecs > >> > > >> > sip:[email protected]<sip:[email protected]:1063;transport=tcp;x-sipX-nonat>1 > >> 3 > >> > 25 sipxecs > >> > > >> > > >> > Am I missing a step on configuring something to have the Polycom > >> > phones connect as a NAT client? I have X-Lite working just fine: > >> > > >> > "Test Phone"<sip:[email protected]> > >> > > >> > <sip:[email protected]:28436;rinstance=b83c40108342c5fb;x-sipX-privcontac > >> t > >> > =74.2.3.4%3A28436> > >> > 611 sipxecs > >> > > >> > > >> > I am using the following BootROM and SIP App: > >> > > >> > spip_ssip_vvx_3_1_3RevC_release_sig_split.zip > >> > spip_ssip_BootROM_4_2_1_release_sig.zip > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > B > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List > >> Archive: > >> > http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > >> > Unsubscribe: > http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > >> > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List > >> Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > >> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > >> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > >> > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
