Anyone can request access to the wiki. Once you have access, contributions can be made at will.
There is a forum at forum.sipfoundry.com that is tracking all of the emails in this list. At www.sipfoundry.com you can find the process for contributing code to the community. From: Rhon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 3:28 PM To: Todd Hodgen; [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Managed Phones and Gateways Hi Todd, I've seen a lot documentations everywhere (sipxecs.blogspot.com, myitdepartment.com) are only among the few. Maybe (just maybe) people can't find a place where to put their contributions? I know mailing list is here, but perhaps you'll all agree, it's hard to find information in the mailing list. IMHO, the site forum should give a room for contributions to come in. I've seen a lot of opensouce development and forum is one effective means of letting people actively participate and contribute to the community. As I said, I'm willing to contribute to the community whatever we can accomplish in our project documentation. Best regards, Rhon On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Todd Hodgen <[email protected]> wrote: The wiki is completely built by community involvement. We all have an obligation to fix what is not accurate, or create articles for the mutual benefit of the rest of the community. To quote Scott, "sipXecs is free, but not like beer". A pretty nice analogy. Our cost as members of this community is testing, validation, and documentation. So, open a not free beer, and dig in to help the community get their free beer. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rhon Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 3:13 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [sipx-users] Managed Phones and Gateways Hi Everyone, I'm a little confused about the definition on Managed Phones and Gateways in SipXecs. Does the word "Managed" mean "Plug and Play"? Based in our experience with Cisco 7970G Phone and Audiocode MP118 (which are both managed devices), these term does not fit well. IMHO, the only device that was provision automatically by Sipx is my Polycom 650 phone. I also noticed, even with the release of SiXecs 4.2 the problem with auto provisioning remained. The wiki seem to be lacking an important part in the configuration to make things work flawlessly. - Rhon
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
