If it matches (permisssions or not) the first match wins. Perhaps creating two branches and assigning the gateway from there might be an alternative approach. You will probably need to configure user(s) to each branch to test. ============================ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: Picher, Michael <[email protected]> Cc: sipx-users <[email protected]> Sent: Fri May 07 07:18:43 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Auth required for a call from unmanaged GWtounmanagedGW (with no perm. configured)? No, I don't have multiple dialplans matching same dialstring. Disabling the dialing rule without permissions results in a 404 Not found. So there cannot be another dialing rule matching the same dial string(?) Rene 2010/5/7 Picher, Michael <[email protected]> > No, has nothing to do with one gateway on two rules… > > > > But this is expected behavior…. Research multiple dial plans matching > same dial string. Discussed over, and over, and over… > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rene Pankratz > *Sent:* Friday, May 07, 2010 6:42 AM > *To:* sipx-users > *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Auth required for a call from unmanaged GW > tounmanaged GW (with no perm. configured)? > > > > I already answered the Question myself. After removing the unmanaged GW > from the dialing rule with permissions the other dialing rule without > permission works like a charm. > > Is it expected behaviour, that you cannot use a gateway on 2 dialing rules > (one with, and one without permissions)? > > afaik I cannot add an unmanaged GW twice to the same SipX config, right? > > So how to solve this problem? > > René > > 2010/5/7 Rene Pankratz <[email protected]> > > Hello, > I have a PSTN GW and another unmanaged GW connected to the SipX (4.0.4). > > Incoming calls from PSTN that match an extension (e.g exact match on ext > "298") shall be routed to the other unmanaged GW. > But unfortunately the SipX wants the PSTN GW to be authenticated and sends > a 407. > > No permission is configured to be needed in the dialing rule for the > second > unmanaged GW. Of course incoming calls ID also do not match an existing > user > on SipX. > > When I disble the dialing Rule I get a 404 not found. So the dialing rule > is the one that matches. > > I have another dialing rule in my diaplan that needs permissions and also > uses the unmanaged GW. Is it not possible to route calls to specific > extensions without a permission through the GW when another dialing rule > (with permissions) also uses the GW? > > Thanks in advance > René > > > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
