Good (sobering) points Tony. I guess that, at a minimum, I need to no longer allow my users the option of blocking caller-I'd, since I know and have tested that 911 address lookup works when I don't tell sipx to block.
As far as an SBC goes, I am not really sure where to look. Is flexible handling of trust and asserted identity a strength of any SBC anyone can point me to? Thanks, Jeff On May 9, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Tony Graziano <[email protected]> wrote: > ealize that what you are doing is acting as a provider for public services. > sipXecs was designed as an enterprise solution, and has "gateway/branch" > functions that will act to ensure the proper caller-id and gateway is used > when sending 911. In a residential or consumer environment, you probably need > to look for a specialty SBC to intercede between sipx and your provider to do > what you are trying to do, because, well, it's not designed in the way you > decided to employ it is all. > > While it is neat you decided to do so, I would never have tried to do > something without addressing 911 first, because the penalties are severe and > I for one am not interested in breaking 911 service or becoming the one > someone points my finger to when the local ESOC launches a complaint. > > Without an interceding device, I do not know how you would address it, > really. You "should" advertise it is not desgined for use as a replacement > land line nor 911 compatible, and not allow 911 dialling until you resolve it > though. > > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
