On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Tony Graziano <[email protected]> wrote: > TLS peering (system to system) is being added in 4.2, but that is as > far as it has gotten thus far. > > The handle sips for remote users, I might suggest approaching it with > a SBC capable of handling the remote user and then handling it > unencrypted inside and similarly for siptrunks. >
Thanks for the quick reply. The RFC mentioned using IPSec. For our potential implementation, we'd probably just put the sipX server in a network segment that requires SSL VPN access. -- Jiann-Ming Su "I have to decide between two equally frightening options. If I wanted to do that, I'd vote." --Duckman "The system's broke, Hank. The election baby has peed in the bath water. You got to throw 'em both out." --Dale Gribble "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.” --Joseph Stalin _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
