On 7/15/2010 8:21 PM, Josh Patten wrote:
Use the latest BootROM
Use 3.2.2 if you don't need SLA
Use 3.1.3RevC if you need SLA
Isn't that backwards? I thought 3.2.2 was the latest that let SLA work
but also introduced the bug with phones over circuits with latency.
Maybe I'm mixing up my terms or confused....
On 07/15/2010 08:20 PM, Tim Byng wrote:
I've been reading through the documentation and threads trying to
find the recommended Polycom SoundPoint SIP Applicaton and BootROM
version. I know that there's a bug with the 3.2.3 SIP Application, so
I'll stay away from that. However, I've seen some recommendations to
use 3.2.2 and some to use 3.1.3RevC (which is what I'm currently
using with sipXecs 4.0.1). I don't see much mentioned about the
recommended BootROM version (I guess it's not as important).
I mainly have local SoundPoint 320 phones. I have one 550 set up as a
remote worker phone.
Thanks,
Tim
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing [email protected]
List Archive:http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe:http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX --http://www.sipfoundry.org/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
