I have been using voip.ms for over a year now. Up until recently, I have
been very happy with them. However, I'm not too pleased at this moment.

I've had an issue with one of my DIDs for at least 2 weeks now. I had to
constantly request support before they replied (5 days before I got a
response, 11 days before they confirmed that there was an issue). The issue
has not been resolved yet. I am currently working around the issue by using
a US POP based on their recommendation. They confirmed that one of there
carriers is experiencing issues with their Canadian POPs.

Today at about 9am, I could not register to the Chicago POP. Even worse, my
failover options did not kick in and inbound calls received a busy tone.
Thankfully, I got an email notification from sipXecs right when this
happened and I was able to get back up and running in about 10 minutes after
troubleshooting and switching to the New York server.

As I mentioned above, up until now I have been very happy with them. I have
recommended them a number of times in the past. Everything had been top
notch; voice quality was great, reliability was really good, no DTMF issues,
excellent set of features, great technical support, great rates,
etc. Hopefully this is just a bad run for them that will end soon.

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Eric Varsanyi <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm pretty happy with voip.ms, esp now that they have a Chicago POP (which
> is close to me). My only issues with them is flakey DTMF outbound, I'm sure
> the proxying has something to do with this. Usually outbound calls have
> working DTMF but 1 in 5 the digits get dropped or delayed (for seconds) --
> when this happens re-originating the call usually results in a working
> connection.
>
> -Eric
>
>
> On Jul 20, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Robert B wrote:
>
>  I've had good luck with Voip.ms as well.
>
> The only technical issue with them is that they proxy the media stream.
> However, I've never had a dropped call, echo, or call completion problems.
> Their service just seems to work and work really well.
>
> -- Robert
>
>
> On 7/20/2010 8:43 AM, Ken Fulmer wrote:
>
> We’ve been using Broadvox but orders are taking a long time to complete.
> Has anyone on the list had good experiences with other VoIP providers? We’re
> looking for one with many rate centers and the ability to get or port
> numbers in the Southeast.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Ken Fulmer
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to