Are you guys meaning to spam ... Sent from my iPhone
On 27/07/2010, at 9:33 PM, Michael Scheidell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/26/10 8:23 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: >> port swapping wonkyness of sipXbridge > yes, this part. ezuce needs to fix this, and/or someone needs to > document that it doesn't work. > (I have tried to get help on this for.. months. people who never tried > it always tell me the same thing. ) > BUT it seems that IP BASED auth/registration will NOT work with > non-standard ports, since something in sipxbridge reverts back to port > 5060, no matter whats in the interface. and level3 and I wasted three > days fighting a battle that apparently was lost to begin with. > > (all you who tell me that IP based auth/registration SHOULD work with > voip.ms: put your money where your mouth is. make it work. it won't. > with ip based, voip.ms wants to connect to sipx on port 5060. nothing > on their customer interface allows you to change that to 5080. only way > to get it to work on 5080 is user/password auth. > similar strangeness with skype. but with skype, you could put in your > port number) > > > level three NOW tells me they could have just done port 5060 :-) (take > THAT ATT and Verizon!) > > however, now, I am using them as an sbc, not sipx, and I don't know what > else won't work. > > calls don't forward, three way conference doesn't work. > > level 3 looking at it now. > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). > For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ > ______________________________________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > Sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ Sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
