Since I have done a hostile takeover on all things freeswitch in sipx it seems, 
I can also take responsibility for updating all docs related to that part. I 
have a new guy starting in my office from 01/09 who will be doing our german 
freeswitch wiki and I will add to his responsibilities to create a whole bunch 
of freeswitch/sipx related docs in the new wiki.

And just for the record ... I am a xwiki fan and confluence drives me insane ;)


Am 05.08.2010 um 15:55 schrieb Geoff Van Brunt:

> The issue I see with not copying is that documentation does not get
> updated. In the old wiki there was a ton of documentation that was
> outdated. Let's face it, most developers hate documenting things... :)
> This confused new users which are the very people the project would like
> to attract. 
> 
> I do however agree with you about the problems with that approach. One
> comment I would like to make in general about the project; there is no
> formal process for "who is responsible for what". In other open source
> projects they often have project leads for various parts. It is
> documented on the website etc. Handy for devs as well as end users. It
> also makes it easy to see when a particular project losses traction and
> might need some people to move it along. it also assures that projects
> continue to evolve instead of stagnate. If that approach is adopted, you
> (or a committee) could appoint someone to be the "project lead" of
> documentation. It would be their job every release to keep everything up
> to date. That approach would also let some non-developers contribute
> back to the project if they wished to...
> 
> Anyhow, just my 2 cents...
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Douglas
> Hubler
> Sent: August-04-10 6:54 PM
> To: sipx-users
> Subject: [sipx-users] Wiki versioning good or bad idea
> 
> Anyone a fan of Confluence's feature to copy entire spaces into new
> versions?  I'm not and here's why
> 
> * Simple search pulls up redundant copies of probably the same
> information
> * Editors can easily make mistakes and edit the wrong version if they
> are not careful or not aware (just happened with ldap)
> 
> Proposal
> * Don't use versioning in confluence and if developers want to version
> things that are in upcoming releases to existing pages, they can add an
> in-line image denoting the version.  Kinda like the "v3.8" image you see
> in this page
> 
> 
> http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Import_User_and_Device_Data_from_
> CSV_Files
> 
> Benefits
> * none of the issues notes above
> * only the developers need to be aware of this
> * worst case if it's not done, it's not a big deal
> * if we want to remove all images because version is so old, just delete
> image or replace image w/blank image
> 
> Another proposal
> * Screw trying to version things, it's a wiki.  Go to page history if
> you care _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Michal Bielicki
Geschäftsführer / CEO

Seventh Signal Ltd. & Co. KG
Meiereifeld 2A
14532 Kleinmachnow

Büro Berlin:
Weigandufer 45, Büro 115
12059 Berlin

Amtsgericht Potsdam HRA 4866 P, Ust.-ID: DE266981999
Geschäftsführer: Michal Bielicki
Persönlich Haftende Gesellschafterin:
Seventh Signal Ltd, 69 Great Hampton St. Birmingham, 
B18 6EW, GB, Company Nr.: 06889439
WWW.: http://www.seventhsignal.de

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to