Unless you put sipXbridge on a separate host. That seems a lot easier to me that using anything else
--martin From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Scheidell Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 9:28 PM To: Michael Scheidell Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SIMPLE SOLUTION FOR ITSP'S WHO SEND TO PORT 5060 Re: iptables experts: port forwarding. Oto further complicate matters are pure sip url calls from 'the world'. If you are forwarding 5060 -> sipxbridge:5080 and 5061 ->sipxbridge:5060, what happens when I make a sip:[email protected] to you? do I have to use sip:[email protected]:5061? I assume all this goes away if we put a REAL sbc in front of sipx? anyone know if the freeswitch package for pfsense can be used to do this? or sipproxyd? this is what you are talking about. so, bottom line, if the ITSP wont' signal on port 5080, its a no go for now, right?-- <http://sipxecs.blogspot.com/2009/09/pfsense-with-freeswitch-for-sip-trunks. html> <http://sipxecs.blogspot.com/2009/09/pfsense-with-freeswitch-for-sip-trunks. html> -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 ISN: 1259*1300 > | SECNAP Network Security Corporation . Certified SNORT Integrator . 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance . Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness . Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide . King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 _____ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrapR. For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ _____
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
