Your itsp might be sending the did in the to header instead. Ask them what they send in the invite and what they send in the "to". ============================ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Mon Aug 23 13:29:29 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs registrar gives 404 for new DID number? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <50956> Message-ID: <[email protected]> 1. 4.0.4-017289 (Yes, I know we're overdue for an upgrade. The upgrade will be happening mid-September.) 2. Yes, both sides show that the registration was successful, and outbound calls through the 2nd ITSP succeed normally. 3. MidwestSIP (a local SIP provider) As far as I can tell, the INVITE from MidwestSIP looks fine, but for some reason the sipXregister is rejecting it as 404. Tony Graziano wrote on Mon, 23 August 2010 13:22 > 1. What version sipx? > 2. Does sipx and the registrars agree that sipx has > registered with them? > 3. Who is the ITSP ( 2nd one)? > ============================ > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: [email protected][/email] > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > Fax: 434.984.8427 > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [email protected][/email] > <[email protected][/email]> > To: [email protected][/email] > <[email protected][/email]> > Sent: Mon Aug 23 13:09:33 2010 > Subject: [sipx-users] sipXecs registrar gives 404 for > new DID number? > > Good afternoon, > > We have two ITSPs, set up as Gateways in our sipXecs > server. > The two Gateways are configured identically, except for > the > IP Address, username, and password. > > We have six DID Numbers. I have users (DID01, DID02, > DID03, > ..., DID06) configured for each DID Number, with the > actual > phone numbers configured as aliases (three times: > 1xxxyyyzzz xxxyyyzzz yyyzzz). The forwarding rules for > the > user are configured to forward calls to our "everyone" > hunt > group (we all answer phones here.) > > This morning I created a new user, DID08, specified the > DID > number from the 2nd ITSP as the alias (three times, as > above) and configured forwarding to forward calls to > our > "everyone" hunt group. > > > As far as I can tell, the Gateways are configured > identically (except for the identification info) and > the > users are configured identically. > > > When I call any of the DID numbers from the 1st ITSP, > everything works as expected. > > When I call the DID number from the 2nd ITSP, the > sipXecs > registrar returns a 404 to the sipXproxy, which returns > a > 404 to the sipXbridge, which returns it to the ITSP, > causing > the call to fail. > > > Anyone have any idea where I went wrong? I've attached > the > sipXtrace of the failed inbound call. > > -- > Mike Burden > Lynk Systems, Ince-mail: > mailto:[email protected][/email][/email][/email]Phone: > 616-532-4985 > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected][/email] > List Archive: > http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- Mike Burden Lynk Systems, Ince-mail: mailto:[email protected][/email][/email]Phone: 616-532-4985 _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
