On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) <[email protected]> wrote: > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] > [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Talbot, Peter > [[email protected]] > > shouldn’t SBC1 be trying to send that traffic off to SIPX1 based on DNS SRV > Records? > ________________________________________ > > Possibly so. But you haven't shown us that the request was routed via TCP. > If it was routed via UDP, the _sip._udp records would control the request > routing. > > Dale > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >
Does HA actually support a sipxbridge "only" role? I am under the impression a PROXY role must be attached in order for HA to work, even with no users directly created under it. I don't think it does. I think I have asked this question before about a standalone SBC using sipxbridge, and this is the understanding I took away from it. Someone correct me if I am wrong. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
