I'm not sure I fully understand the question but let me answer what I think you are asking...
>From a gateway perspective you could just individually add gatways to each of the sipXecs systems... you don't necessarily need to go back through a single system just because it has the gateway 'on it'. But the remote system has no knowledge of another system's permissions / groups. Mike On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Kyle Haefner <[email protected]>wrote: > Another wrench! > > I enabled a default permission on my 5 digit dial rule. It worked as > Josh said it would, now sipx sends a 407 back to the gateways then the > Nortel switch drops the call. What I found out though is remote > offices could not call five digit numbers out through the gateway (I > have sit-to-site dialing between the main office and remote offices, > that permission blocks the calls from remote offices that are bound > for non-sipx 5 digit extensions) is there a way to remote sites > permissions? > > Kyle > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Michael Picher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jason, > > > > What you could do is create a permission labeled 'Call3000' (or whatever) > and then make a dial plan entry that looks for 3xxx and requires permission > Call3000. Then users that don't have that won't be able to call those > extensions. > > > > Not exactly sure what this would do to inbound calling however ;-) You > could route all your inbound calls to aliases... > > > > Mike > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:06 PM, [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > His Nikolay > > > > I am trying to use yr method to block internal extension dialing, that is > 2xxx cannot dial 3xxx. Same thing, I create a dial plan that translate 3xxx > to something else when 2xxx extension press 3xxx number. Then send the > translated number to the unmanaged gateway. > > > > I have try, but seem that the dial plan does not process my number > > > > Is it possible to do it this way? > > > > Thanks > > Jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 24, 2010, at 16:52, "Nikolay Kondratyev" <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > >> The following worked for me: > >> > >> I have 4 digit extensions 3xxx and 2xxx. > >> I want to route all 2xxx unknown numbers to a separate AA. > >> > >> I created new AA and dial rule for it, so that this new AA has number > 3333. > >> Then I created the folowing custom rule: > >> Match prefix 2 and 3 digits, dial 3333, no gateway. > >> The rule is the very last in the dial plan. > >> This rule intercepts all calls to 2xxx, so that registered extensions > are > >> not available any more. > >> > >> But... Some time ago (a year or more) somebody in the list offered the > >> following workaround (and it works for me now): > >> I created an unmanaged gateway, named, say, Myself, with sipx own ip > >> address. > >> I modified my rule, so that 2xxx numbers are translated to 3333 and > routed > >> to gateway Myself. > >> (In this way the rule goes into fallbackrules.xml instead of > >> mappingruels.xml. Mappingrules is processed first.) > >> > >> Now the call is routed to the phone (or vm) if a user exists, and to new > AA > >> when not. > >> > >> I'm not sure if any side effect may appear... When call tranferring or > >> pickup or something else... > >> Additional tests need to be performed... > >> > >> Rgds, > >> Nikolay. > >> > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]> > >>> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>] On Behalf Of > >>> Kyle Haefner > >>> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 11:44 PM > >>> To: sipx-users > >>> Subject: [sipx-users] Non-route-able numbers > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Is there a way to setup the dial plan such that any extension > >>> of a certain length is answered even if there is no > >>> corresponding user/attendant/conference? > >>> > >>> The problem is I have a block of numbers that have been > >>> ported from our DMS100 switch, not all these numbers are > >>> assigned to users yet i.e. I have not created users with > >>> those extensions yet. What I would like is to have these > >>> numbers sent to an auto-attendant that simply plays a message > >>> saying that the call cannot be completed as dialed. I know I > >>> could do this with a phantom user and aliases, but that > >>> quickly becomes unmanageable. How do I set-up a catch-all > >>> for inbound calls? > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> Kyle > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> sipx-users mailing list > >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sipx-users mailing list > >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-users mailing list > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > > > > > > > -- > > There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary > and those who don't. > > > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > blog: http://www.sipxecs.info > > call: sip:[email protected] <sip%[email protected]><mailto: > sip%[email protected] <sip%[email protected]>> > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't. [email protected] blog: http://www.sipxecs.info call: sip:[email protected] <sip%[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
