On 6 okt 2010, at 23.45, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > I now have time to look into this.
Great! > It looks like this is a problem with the remote NAT traversal feature. It's > possible that it isn't specific to GRUU processing. I will talk to our > expert on NAT Traversal. OK, just let me know if you need additional traces. > There is one other problem. I don't think it is causing a malfunction in > this situation, but it might in other situations. The Tandberg is being > given <sip:[email protected];gr> as its GRUU, but it is using > <sip:[email protected];gr;transport=tcp> as its Contact. (Server: > TANDBERG/257 (TE2.2.0.215697)) It should not be doing that; UAs must treat > GRUUs opaquely. I will contact Tandberg on that one. /Staffan -- Staffan Kerker mail/sip/xmpp: [email protected] "There is absolutely no money above the 5th fret..." /Donald "Duck" Dunn
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
