I started working on that but haven't had time to spend on it recently.

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Paul Herron <[email protected]>wrote:

>  Mike,
>
>
>
> Weren’t you working with iptables on Sipx to limit access to management and
> admin functions as Abdul requests?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ... and I never put a sip server interface directly on the internet.
>
>
>
> If I have that much infrastructure I need to connect to I'd get a
> commercial SBC or firewall that is SIP capable to do that, so I can truly
> protect it and manage it.
>
>
>
> Exposing a PBX to every nook and cranny of a network with multiple
> interfaces creates a management and security task for something that should
> obviously be in place that is designed to do just that.
>
>
>
> That being said, I think you will see things discussed on how/why to
> implement multiple network cards in 'post 4.4', and would encourage you to
> take part in that discussion.
>
>
>
> Let's all keep sight of the fact that sipx is, at the core, a replacement
> for the corporate PBX. It is NOT a security device. While support for TLS is
> being built in, and the fact that it requires authorization for placing
> outbound calls, in no way makes it more or less secure as the OS you run it
> on. I've seen linux servers get rootkits, with a whole lot of security and
> tools to prevent those ickies implemented on them. Firewalls are not a bad
> idea, no, wait, they are an awesome idea.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Michael Picher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> I can see the usefulness of that...
>
>
>
> If I were going to that level I guess I'd just use a firewall to control
> access to SSH and also to block any unneeded ports.
>
>
>
> Hopefully we'll get at that point in version 5.0.  Again, you're not the
> first to ask for it, but usually somebody wants to stick one leg of the
> server on the internet to avoid NAT...
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Abdul Mayat <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>  charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Organization: SipXecs Forum
>
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]
> >
> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <53807>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Its not a requirement driven by throughput or resiliency...
>
> Its a common setup in enterprise environments for servers to
> be connected to a private network for management and admin
> (backups, updates, monitoring etc) and then have servers
> connected to a separate public or private network for
> applications.
>
> Maybe one of the redhat guy's can confirm this?
>
> Seems like we should have a config setting in the
> application to allow the admin to explicitly set the IP
> address of the box...which in fact we do with the initial
> setup script, so still not sure why the application would
> bind to the wrong address...
>
> If there is enough interest, maybe I'll give this a try and
> report back what breaks...!
>
>
> Abdul
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
>
>
>  --
> There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and
> those who don't.
>
> [email protected]
> blog: http://www.sipxecs.info
> call: sip:[email protected] <sip%[email protected]>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
>
>
>
> --
> ======================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> sip: [email protected]
> Fax: 434.326.5325
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> sip: [email protected]
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://support.myitdepartment.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>



-- 
There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and
those who don't.

[email protected]
blog: http://www.sipxecs.info
call: sip:[email protected] <sip%[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to