On 11/1/10 3:42 PM, Todd Hodgen wrote:
I am a reseller of Broadvox, and a user of Voip.ms. I don't
recommend Voip.ms to customers except for labs, etc. as I find that
they are not totally reliable. They are very cost effective, if you
have a customer that does not sit at their phone all day long, it
works great, but if they are on the phone for any length of time, I
don't personally recommend VOIP.ms. Others may disagree, but
speaking from a voice quality perspective, they are not a match to
Broadvox, who I find have exceptional call quality, even without a
customer portal.
I second that.
I have seen their trunks go down every once in a while, not be
reachable, etc.
I would like to use the ip based authentication (and not the
user/password) so that maybe they TRY a termination anyway (but that
won't work until the port 5060 patches in sipx 4.4)
reasonable tech support, and .99/c per month for 20 channel did's and
1.1c per min isn't bad for cost.
heck, if you don't need conferencing, you could build a while HIPC using
just their interface (and no sipz)
no, I am not using their .99c per trunk sip lines. I am paying level3
$14 per CCP per month, because I can't chance them being down.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
