simpler, yes... more reliable, no. operating system based static routes are one of those things (specially in windows machines) that gets overlooked... and also causes headaches when you're trying to diagnose network problems and one or two machines are behaving totally different than others!
to each their own though... On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:35 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 05:09:50 -0500, Michael Picher wrote: > > You're almost always better off doing your routing in routers (imagine > > that)... rather than leaving it up to individual hosts. > > Like you say,'almost'. Sometimes it's simpler to just add a small function > on a server. > Figured it's worth asking in case others have had to. > In my case, this didn't solve the problem so I may yet have to add a route > on the server after all. > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't. [email protected] blog: http://www.sipxecs.info call: sip:[email protected] <sip%[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
