I was just about to ask what the "recommended" ITSP was here. I'll try them and report back. Will hopefully know something here in the next couple hours. FWIW, I have our Cisco firewall set to not block from this server outgoing on any tcp or udp port, and have port randomization turned off. This server also has a 1-to-1 NAT, so there should be no NAT issues going on. The fact that we have calls inbound without issue right now I believe has eliminated the firewall from the equation.
--- On Wed, 12/8/10, Michael Scheidell <[email protected]> wrote: From: Michael Scheidell <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Can't place outgoing calls - fast busy To: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 3:13 PM On 12/8/10 4:10 PM, Victor Williams wrote: Followed this, same result...fast busy. Also get no additional activity in the sipxbridge.log file after your suggested changes. try a known itsp, like www.voip.ms. ($25 deposit.. 1.49C for first did, 1.1c/min plus .99c per month) if they work, its your ITSP. if it doesn't, then you firewall is messing things up (firewall is usually the culprit) -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 ISN: 1259*1300 > | SECNAP Network Security Corporation Certified SNORT Integrator 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap®. For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
