Thanks for the quick replies, but not really what we are looking for. This will result in one instance per tenant. Since this could get big, it could mean a lot of tenants, so this is not desirable.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Scheidell Sent: maandag 13 december 2010 15:32 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Multi tenant administration On 12/13/10 9:26 AM, Henry Dogger wrote: Hi all, We are looking for a possibility to make multi tenant administration possible. Now it is possible to control everything: ‘superadmin’ and your own extension: ‘User’ one thought: lightweight jails (not full virtualization since that takes lots of resources and task switching) an ibm p series, with linux and lpars. 0 overhead. you put each tenant into their own lpar. if sipx port was upgraded from the 3.x* versions to current versions for freebsd, you could use freebsd jails. (which is only a super chroot ish thing. it chroot's the root and networking as well) you could have 16 tenants, 16 copies of postgress, http, etc all running on individual ip addresses. 0 overhead since their is no VM taskswitching. but consider the ibm p series with lpars. (but I would love to see the freebsd port updated), freeswitch already runs as a plugin to pfsense. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 ISN: 1259*1300 > | SECNAP Network Security Corporation · Certified SNORT Integrator · 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance · Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness · Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide · King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 ________________________________ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap®. For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ ________________________________
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
