Yes. We do it all the time with ITSp's who can send the inbound invite to port 5080.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Burleigh, Matt < [email protected]> wrote: > *“Q2- Can SipXBridge and the Remote User NAT Traversal feature be both > enabled at the same time?* > > A2- The sipXbridge and the remote user NAT traversal features are built to > co-exist so long at sipXbridge is *not* configured as the default SBC in > the System->Internet Calling page. Assuming the default port values are > used, incoming traffic from ITSPs must be directed to port 5080 to hit the > sipXbridge and incoming traffic from remote users must be directed to port > 5060 to hit the sipXproxy which provide remote NAT compensation.” > > > > Does this mean that sipXbridge and the remote user NAT traversal feature > CAN work together if you are able to redirect ITSP traffic to port 5080? > > > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.326.5325 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://support.myitdepartment.net <http://support.myitdepartment.net>Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
