On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Mircea Carasel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Douglas Hubler <[email protected]> wrote: > > I vote for keeping the details in files, because I think that the admin can > look in the files quicker and easier in disaster situations, to find any > potential error and it doesn't matter if configuration server is up or down. > > Sipxconfig will read details from files and display on the servers page as > specified above. >
IMO we should keep replication details in the audit logs we already writing and node states in db (this could include also enabled / disabled) George _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
