I think Joegen is trying to point out that you don't populate this field with an external controller. You specify that you use an external controller and route your sip calls via that. On May 3, 2011 8:58 AM, "Joe Micciche" <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/02/2011 07:28 PM, Joegen Baclor wrote: >> I don't understand the question. If you have an SBC infront which takes >> care of the mesh, what's the need for sipX to even be knowledgeable, >> more so, manage the public addresses? > > Joegen, I have more than one SBC for external access. sipX only > accomodates a single IP under Server -> NAT. How will it handle multiple > external IP's? > > - -- > ================================================================== > Joe Micciche [email protected] > Red Hat, Inc. http://www.redhat.com > Senior Communications Engineer X (81) 44554 > +1.919.754.4554 Key: 65F90FE1 > ================================================================== > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk2/+8wACgkQJHjEUGX5D+FcKwCcCZd+TNbOw/dQb8GvyOQFnaDR > YJ0AoL06VV2lPqYHEElXtT0K7DJT5nva > =x2pe > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
