Did you take a look at the Cisco route example I uploaded to the wiki??? This was from a known good working config. Also pay attention to version.
Mike - coming to you from Seattle :-) 2011/5/9 Todd Hodgen <[email protected]> > I have a merge.xml file of a failed transfer request between Cisco Router > and sipXecs that is a bit odd, hoping someone can give me some hints. > > > > The scenario is this – Cisco 3945 operating as a gateway between a sipXecs > HA and a Nortel CS1k. Call is placed from a set on the Nortel CS1k ext. > 7361 through the gateway at 10.1.171.254 to sipXecs extension 5453. Call is > established. > > > > 5453 transfers call to 5457. Extension 5453 received a reorder tone, while > ext 5457 receives the call with full audio. The call is seen being placed > on hold for the transfer. > > > > It appears the refer to Cisco is not acceptable, but I’m clueless as to > what the underlying issue is. Does anyone have experience with Cisco IOS > to know if they accept refers correctly? > > > > This is running 4.2.1 with Polycom 550 and 650 phones with 3.2.4b > firmware. It has been tested with same results on 3.1.3c split. > > > > It was suggested a line in IOS needed to be added for SIP to SIP calls. It > has been verified to be in place with the correct syntax and location in the > config file. > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't. [email protected] blog: http://www.sipxecs.info call: sip:[email protected]
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
