They say it is their goal to be binary compatible. On 5/13/2011 9:08 AM, Josh M. Patten wrote: > Perhaps the glory days are over. Is SL6 binary compatible with RHEL6? If so > it might be in the sipXecs project's best interest to recommend new > installations use SL6. Just a thought. > > Josh Patten > Brazos County Network Engineer > 979.361.4676 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew Kitchin > (public/usenet) > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 9:03 AM > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: [sipx-users] CentOS troubles??? > > http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/en/2011/05/the-rise-and-fall-of-centos.html > > This was unfortunately an interesting read for me. CentOS has been our > corporate standard for years. I hope they resolve their issues, but the Dag > Wieers issue does not seem like a good sign. That repo has always been > reliable for me for packages. > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
