Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <59972> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Quote: > Joegen Baclor added a comment - 2011-05-18 18:53 > Andrew, what you are mentioning here is a SUBSCRIPTION > for message-summary (voice mails) which was never > NOTIFY'ed by sipX. This is a different bug altogether. The > significant packet is at record 1290 which was responded > to by 408 request timeout. Do you have the debug level > proxy log for this? Oh, I do see that after F8, what I initially thought was F9-F10 is "message-summary" and not "dialog;sla". Oops. I guess we need to determine what, if anything, is wrong with F9 at frame 1290 that made the server respond with a 408. I suppose the question is, why couldn't the server produce a response within a suitable amount of time? I will take another tcpdump whilst gathering debug logs and post them back to the JIRA. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
