Measured Service lines is an excellent idea for cases such as this. Fax sharing devices is another method of having one Pots line, used for several devices to lower your overall costs.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kyle Haefner Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:55 AM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] analog/modem support questions I've also had some success with Audiocodes FXS and modems, however some just wouldn't work we had a natural gas meter that worked through a Cisco VG200 and I never could get it to work over an Audiocodes device. There are always measured business rate PSTN lines that are pretty cheap, you usually pay a monthly fee and then for minutes that you use. Kyle On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Todd Hodgen <[email protected]> wrote: > I do use Audiocodes FXS ports for very low speed modems in Postage Machines successfully. However, the local trunks feed from a Patton Smartnode Gateway to a PRI, not SIP trunks from an ITSP as you are wanting to do. Big difference in infrastructure. > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of R. Benjamin Kessler > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 6:43 AM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: [sipx-users] analog/modem support questions > > All > > We have a small SIPX system using SIP trunks over the Internet for PSTN access. > > We have a new requirement to be able to support an analog modem (or two) and I was wondering if anyone has done this with any kind of success already. > > The modems would be used to dial-up to remote routers, etc. to access device consoles out-of-band so the speed requirements are low (e.g. 9600 baud). > > If anyone has done this (or something similar) please let me know Im interested in details like, ATA(s) used, and any particular tricks that had to be performed to make things work. > > I realize that Im asking for something that is sub-optimal, Im just trying to avoid a monthly charge for a POTS line that may only get used twice a year. > > Thanks, > > Ben > ________________________________ > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> > Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3657 - Release Date: 05/24/11 > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3660 - Release Date: 05/25/11 _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
