On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Douglas Hubler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Douglas Hubler <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Tony Graziano
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've disabled it for now in lieu of another method which should yield
>>> more results tomorrow on whether or not it can be backed up without
>>> consuming 5gb more of ram.
>>>
>>> Is there a limit to the memory the sipx backup can consume?
>
> you can force a limit in the startup script but i'm not sure the impact
> given it's unclear why it needs that much memory to begin with.  if it's
> required then you'll wind up with sipxconfig getting into a bad state.
>
>>
>> Is sipxconfig consuming the memory?  If not what is?
>
>
> It would be good if you can verify this.
> George and to a degree I spent a lot of time trying to duplicate this.
>  George, did you ever  get Michael K's actually sipxconfig database and see
> if that made a difference?
>

No, I didn't, however it needs other files as well (like uploaded
device files). If someone provides a problematic backup I could
restore it on my machine and give it another try.

George
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to