Kemal,

Did you test what I suggested doing?

Mike

2011/6/9 Kemal Eroğlu <[email protected]>

> Hello,
>
> First of all, in this case master is our DNS, but master also has an upper
> DNS which is the DNS we used in our company.
>
> I also think that something is wrong with the DNS resolving mechanism of
> the secondary machine. I used putty when the setup is working and it can
> ping the fqdn of primary server; but when it tries to connect the master in
> setup, it gives this error. I could not figure out why.
>
> I tried to add a new line to the /etc/hosts of secondary. It is working in
> this condition. But it is not a desired condition to apply this in every HA
> setup we do.
>
> I checked both server's /etc/resolv.conf files, they seemed OK to me.
> Secondary server's resolv.conf file is set by the setup script during the
> setup. So it has master IP address as its DNS. I think secondary server
> should query the master fqdn and the master should be able to resolve it
> normally. I found it strange.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Kemal
>
>
> On 8 June 2011 22:32, Joe Micciche <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> > Hello,
>> > I have an extended sipxecs 4.4 HA setup with one primary and one
>> redundant
>> > server. When I set up the redundant, during sipxecs-setup, in the last
>> step
>> > it asks for master-fqdn, master-ip and password to get the configuration
>> > files from master. I provide the information but it gives an error,
>> "Failure
>> > fetching configuration from master .... Name or service not known.". It
>> > continuously gives this error, until I abort and redo the
>> "sipxecs-setup"
>> > from the beginning. I investigated about this and saw that, it somehow
>> > cannot resolve the fqdn of the master. Did you encounter such an error
>> or do
>> > you have any idea to fix this?
>>
>> I ran into this exact issue. Check /etc/resolv.conf on the redundant
>> server and make sure you have known good nameservers. Somehow my proxy
>> had a garbage entry in there which prevented it getting config from the
>> core sipxecs server - I removed the bad line and everything worked fine.
>>
>> - --
>> ==================================================================
>> Joe Micciche                            [email protected]
>> Red Hat, Inc.                           http://www.redhat.com
>> Senior Communications Engineer          X(81) 44554
>> +1.919.754.4554
>> ==================================================================
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAk3vzlkACgkQJHjEUGX5D+GL1wCgxIstfwAA9GEitFmbi/Im3Hxa
>> qaoAnRcQFg1x4jAfBTnY2AMBjnc3eS9i
>> =mePE
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>



-- 
Michael Picher
eZuce
Director of Technical Services
O.978-296-1005 X2015
M.207-956-0262
@mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher>
www.ezuce.com
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to