It's funny that I started testing exchange integration today, I think you can add an EUM number to all of your users to address this issue. This is added under the email addresses section of each user.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:08 PM, George Niculae <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Kyle Haefner > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi George, > > > > I've hit a roadblock. When I change a user from a numeric user ID to > > using one that allows authentication with AD, it breaks voice mail > > integration with Exchange UM because the the user ID field is sent in > > the diversion header sent to Exchange. Our Exchange admins tell me > > that there is no way to may none numeric IDs to mailboxes. Do you > > think a new field should be added to the Unified messaging screen > > allowing you to specify the mail box? > > > > Hi Kyle, > > if I get it correctly this looks not an AD related issue but an > Exchange UM integration one (basically having users with non numeric > user names breaks Exchange UM integration). If it so it looks like a > limitation that should be addressed and a JIRA needed and the new > filed could be a solution - maybe to point to an numeric alias (I'd > like to hear more thoughts from people using sipXecs - Exchange UM > integration) > > Thanks, > George > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- Josh Patten eZuce Solutions Architect O.978-296-1005 X2050 M.979-574-5699
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
