I forgot to mention. The spark client connects just fine to a stand alone openfire I installed for testing. It is only the sipx server I cannot connect to.
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:43:00 -0500, [email protected] wrote: > What's the trick to getting spark to connect to the sipx integrated > openfire server? :) > One can use the IM user ID as name/password which doesn't work. > Not sure if one can use the sipx account but that doesn't work either. > > All I find on the net is one question from someone saying they used to be > able to connect to sipx's openfire server but no longer can using client > 2.60/2.6.2. I have also tried the IP, the host/domain and of course, SRV > meaning domain only. > > Mike > > > On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:22:48 -0600, Aaron Pursell wrote: >> I have SipX integrated Openfire working with Video and Audio with Spark. >> But not on Tablets because the flash clients on said tablets do not >> support >> the Camera hook, they can view video/audio but not send. So we're >> basically >> waiting for Adobe to hook this up or another client comes through. >> >> >> Aaron Pursell, Sr. >> Network Systems Administrator >> >> Easter Seals-Goodwill Northern Rocky Mountain, Inc. >> 4400 Central Ave >> Great Falls, Montana 59405 >> >> (406) 771-3721 >> [email protected] >>>>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 10/7/2011 7:22 PM >>> >> On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:40:15 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: >>> Then change the subject (i.e., start a new thread) to reflect the >>> different >>> avenues you are pursuing. You just admitted the "many different >>> directions" >>> >> Tony, you're the only one who has decided that this cannot be done. The >> thread has received input and ideas. There have been others who >> contributed >> thoughts trying to come up with ideas and solutions to problems. >> When things get too personal in threads though, that's pretty much the end >> of the thread. >> >> It started relevant and I can't say that it isn't yet because there may be >> more input. >> >>> to accomplish what you are trying to do, most of which actually do >>> not/may >>> not even have anything to do with sipx. If you want input from sipx >>> users, >>> it should be relevant. It's hard for it to be relevant to sift through >>> now >>> 35 posts and noone is probably all that clear in what you are trying to >>> do. >>> >> I have said several times what I am trying to accomplish and it was >> initially a sipx or at least sipx users question >> It is simply now becoming a bit more obvious that the solution isn't >> related to sipx. That doesn't mean nobody wants to hear about it because >> it >> may be a relevant idea to others as well. In fact, it seems to be >> something >> that a lot of people are trying to figure out >> >> Anyways... >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
