I am not sure I understand the question. If you need to call someone at "B", you would call them directly. Since they are two different systems, I am not sure I would put a user extension of "B" on the AA of system "A". Rather I would just call the AA of "B" and use their AA or call "B" directly.
While there is the "Transfer to Extension or Other Destination" as an option, I'm not sure there is a use case for it as you are describing what you are trying to do. On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:28 PM, John Pi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Organization: SipXecs Forum > In-Reply-To: > <camgknjv1krjs0yvhqw8gy2aj_ch-ybb+fbuaz3f7qo-tzyp...@mail.gmail.com> > X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <64280> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > > > Yes I did. Phones of PBX A are able to call phones of PBX B > via their internal extensions, and vice versa. Should "A to > B calling" be working through auto-attendant of A, according > to these guidelines? Should I enable (if possible somehow) > any permissions about this to the auto-attendant? > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.465.6833 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://support.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
