Joe,
   I spent a lot of time debugging and testing the Cisco plus configuration
files a couple of years back,  however,  stopped working on it due to the
interop issues with the Cisco sip firmware.  For example,  attendant
transfer would work,  but blind transfers did not.  Sometimes you could
place someone on hold and other times they would get stuck on hold and you
had to hard boot the phone.  On some firmwares,  the Cisco phones would not
establish calls with Polycoms.  Calls would go directly to voicemail and
the phone wouldn't even ring.  I would be interested to know if v9 firmware
is any better.
On Nov 2, 2011 5:40 PM, "Joe Micciche" <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is anyone doing anything with the Cisco phone provisioning templates
> in sipX for Cisco firmware Version 9? If not, what needs to be done?
>
> Phones running this firmware get a mostly-correct config file, but I
> cannot get them to register so I'm hand-editing the xml file to format
> & include everything Cisco expects. Once I get it finalized, I'd be
> happy to throw it onto the wiki.
>
> - --
> ==================================================================
> Joe Micciche                            [email protected]
> Red Hat, Inc.                           http://www.redhat.com
> Senior Communications Engineer          X(81) 44554
> +1.919.754.4554
> ==================================================================
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk6xuMwACgkQJHjEUGX5D+FSZACgozEe4DzKxmRzlqlwkaTiJr+g
> GPoAn3ictbBKVk5eM4BK4XNahpQ4wr+R
> =tHZ4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to