I think overall thats a problem, and why it needs to be run on another box until sipx is no longer grabbing any IP or interface made available and starts listening on it...
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Joegen Baclor <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > As requested. Seems like sipXacd is grabbing it. > > [joegen@sipdevel ~]$ sudo netstat -l --program | grep 192.168.1.9 > tcp 0 0 192.168.1.9:25080 > *:* LISTEN 1862/karoo > tcp 0 0 192.168.1.9:atmp > *:* LISTEN 3190/sipxacd > tcp 0 0 192.168.1.9:sde-discovery > *:* LISTEN 3190/sipxacd > tcp 0 0 192.168.1.9:sip > *:* LISTEN 1862/karoo > udp 0 0 192.168.1.9:ntp > *:* 1252/ntpd > udp 0 0 192.168.1.9:25080 > *:* 1862/karoo > udp 0 0 192.168.1.9:sip > *:* 1862/karoo > udp 0 0 192.168.1.9:atmp > *:* 3190/sipxacd > udp 0 0 192.168.1.9:sde-discovery > *:* 3190/sipxacd > > > > On 11/15/2011 08:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > > it would be helpful to know if you grepped the ports of the karoo install > whether or not the virtual ip is bound to any of the sipx processes though. > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Michael Scheidell < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Interesting. This could solve the port 5060 issue with most tier 1 >> itsps. Maybe even the remote issues. >> >> >> >> -- >> Michael Scheidell, CTO >> SECNAP Network Security >> >> >> -----Original message----- >> From: Joegen Baclor <[email protected]> >> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software < >> [email protected]> >> Cc: Michael Scheidell <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tue, Nov 15, 2011 02:24:11 GMT+00:00 >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Accidental call monitoring: strange accident or >> feature? <-- Phenomenon rep >> >> On 11/11/2011 09:00 AM, Joegen Baclor wrote: >> > On 11/11/2011 05:53 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; >> >> charset="utf-8" >> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >> >> Organization: SipXecs Forum >> >> In-Reply-To:<[email protected]> >> >> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8<64440> >> >> Message-ID:<[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [quote title=Joegen Baclor wrote on Tue, 18 October 2011 >> >> 20:29]Try karoo bridge instead. See >> >> http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Karoo+Bridge+SBC >> >> >> >> can that be installed on the same computer as sipx? or do we >> >> need a second computer? >> >> >> > You would normally have it in a separate computer since sipx has >> > issues with multiple nics. In theory, karoo wouldn't mind sharing a >> > bed with sipx. I dont know about the reverse. >> >> >> I tried installing both karoo and sipx in one box yesterday and it >> works. I used a virtual IP for karoo after I installed sipx. You will >> need to modify the default port of mod_socket in the karoo freeswitch >> config becuase it conflicts with the freeswitch config od sipx. >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> > > > > -- > ====================== > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > sip: [email protected] > Fax: 434.465.6833 > > Email: [email protected] > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > sip: [email protected] > > Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net > Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net > > Linked-In Profile: > http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 > Ask about our Internet Fax services! > > > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.465.6833 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services!
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
