Actually, I don't think that's a valid scenario: 1. Not all sip UA's have a reject button. 2. user 202 cannot reject a forwarded call because the intended recipient is 200. Rejecting the call to go to voicemail would be to user 202's vm, and user 202's phone is not authenticated as 200.
I think this is a valid behavior. On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Kumaran T <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi All, > Please check the following scenario in which 2nd scenario seems to have > problem... > > Scenario1: > Call forwarding: > 1.user 200 -30sec > At the same time to user 201-30 secs > No response to user 202-30 sec > 2.user 202 calls 200 > user 200 and 201 not answering the call or reject the > callin both the user after 3 sec > 3.Call will go to VM in 202 phone > Its a valid behavior > Scenario2: > Call forwarding: > 1.user 200 -30sec > At the same time to user 201-30 secs > No response to user 202-30 sec > 2.user 202 calls 200 > user 200 and 201 reject the call within 1-3 secs > 3.Call will not connect to VM rather than it will try to > connectts self(202) and call ended after few sec.. > This behavior is seen in both 4.4 and 0.0.4.5.2.. IMO call should go > VMin any case when user reject the call.. > > Regards, > Kumaran T > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.465.6833 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services!
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
