Hello Tony, We have no backup job configured. It's a pretty clean server, hardly anything is configured.
Regards, Elwin Formsma Telecats BV Op 5 jan. 2012, om 11:27 heeft Tony Graziano het volgende geschreven: Did you have a backup job configured and running also? On Jan 5, 2012 4:11 AM, "Henry Dogger" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, When testing a setup for one of our clients we came across a disturbing issue. We generated a high load of about 180 calls per minute on the system via ISDN, and wanted to let this run for let’s say a week. But after one night we noticed the sipXproxy is not returning its memory or sipXproxy is not doing this fast enough… When we shut the load test down, memory usage was returned back to normal in about an hour. Is this normal behavior? A server under this kind of load will eventually start using its swap memory and then failing (we tested this). At first we tested with a light machine (only 2Gbyte of memory), but we get the same results with a machine with a bigger CPU and 6 Gbyte of memory, but the time it takes the system to fail is longer… Can anyone shed some light on this? We are running: sipXecs (4.4.0- 2011-10-12EDT17:34:54 domU-12-31-39-00-0D-21) Kind regards, Henry Dogger Telecats BV _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
