I am trying to track down some instances of a call forwarding scenario which does only seem to work when the devices involved in the call path are not managed by sipx.
Here is my question: When the user has a call forwarding set to "at the same time", and an internal user calls their phone, we see the two separate INVITE messages go out. In one case we are letting it ring the phone/ua while the other INVITE goes out the local gateway. In both INVITE transactions, the Call-Id is the same (and to the local UA who initiated the call). In both of the call-id's, the branches are identical except for the first "Via". I expect it is OK. Wanted to ask. I just expected the call to be branched and halfway thought there was going to be a separate call-id, but never ran into this particular issue before, so I'm dissecting it. I think the real issue is that the max-forwards has a very low value (16). It seems the firewall the users are behind consumes 50 forwards after contacting it (UA) once (it actually starts at 70), I can't understand why this would be. Has anyone ever seen this before? -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.465.6833 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
