Weird, it's just a voip.ms IP. That IP is supposed to be a Chicago location but 
it resolves to India. 
I thought voip.ms was a Canadian company but guess the roots run deep.





On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:12:52 -0600, [email protected] wrote:
> This morning, I noticed the following on a pfsense firewall.
>
> udp   I 192.168.1.241:5080    64.120.22.242:5060    2:2   1212    50    80
> 13505
> udp   O 192.168.1.241:5080    64.120.22.242:5060    2:2   1212    50    80
> 13505
>
> This resolves to the city of Ujjain in India and we don't have anyone in
> India that should be using the system.
>
> I did a quick tcpdump to see more and got the following;
>
> [root@sx ~]# tcpdump dst 64.120.22.242
> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
> listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
> 12:04:33.405982 IP 192.168.1.241.5080 >
> 64.120.22.242.ubiquityservers.com.sip: SIP, length: 4
> 12:04:53.406059 IP 192.168.1.241.5080 >
> 64.120.22.242.ubiquityservers.com.sip: SIP, length: 4
> 12:05:13.477918 IP 192.168.1.241.5080 >
> 64.120.22.242.ubiquityservers.com.sip: SIP, length: 4
> 12:05:33.409619 IP 192.168.1.241.5080 >
> 64.120.22.242.ubiquityservers.com.sip: SIP, length: 4
> 12:05:53.413251 IP 192.168.1.241.5080 >
> 64.120.22.242.ubiquityservers.com.sip: SIP, length: 4
> 12:06:03.398949 IP 192.168.1.241.5080 >
> 64.120.22.242.ubiquityservers.com.sip: SIP, length: 564
> 12:06:03.444194 IP 192.168.1.241.5080 >
> 64.120.22.242.ubiquityservers.com.sip: SIP, length: 730
> 12:06:13.414199 IP 192.168.1.241.5080 >
> 64.120.22.242.ubiquityservers.com.sip: SIP, length: 4
> 12:06:33.416681 IP 192.168.1.241.5080 >
> 64.120.22.242.ubiquityservers.com.sip: SIP, length: 4
> 12:06:53.417878 IP 192.168.1.241.5080 >
> 64.120.22.242.ubiquityservers.com.sip: SIP, length: 4
>
> Seems to be sitting idle for the most part, connecting out to that network.
> I thought I'd ask on the list in case this is a sipx function but I highly
> doubt it. I don't see any strange outgoing calls or anything out of the
> ordinary either which makes this even weirder.
>
> Does this look like a hack or something else?
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to