I've followed that article. But it's apparent to me that the sipxecs is ignoring my register packets. And when I say no firewall, I mean that I am not firewalling any port on the sipxecs machine. The remote site is behind a firewall/nat, but that doesn't explain why I don't see any register events in the debug logs.
~Noah On Jun 8, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Todd Hodgen wrote: A google search of “sipxecs remote worker wiki” brings this page up in the search - - http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Remote+User+NAT+Traversal BTW – you indicate there is no firewall – are you saying that at the remote worker location, and at the sipXecs location you don’t have a firewall in place at all? I suspect that is really not the case, and if that is an accurate assumption, you will have NAT to deal with in your configuration. Remote worker works, as many people use it today, and have for several years. You will need to find the configuration that works with your individual configuration, this article should be a good start. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Noah Mehl Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 9:55 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Register Phones from the world Terribly sorry, but I'm not following at all. Where is the "support remote workers" option live? Could you please point me to a place in the wiki describing it? Thanks. ~Noah On Jun 7, 2012, at 11:05 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: If you have the option support remote workers enabled. The workers firewall may be an issue. On Jun 7, 2012 10:20 PM, "Noah Mehl" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: There is no firewall, only static NAT. iptables is off on the sipxecs machine. So, you're saying that sipxecs should, by default, respond to register from anywhere? ~Noah On Jun 7, 2012, at 10:17 PM, "Tony Graziano" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Yes. This would really depend on the configuration of any firewall in between though. On Jun 7, 2012 8:28 PM, "Noah Mehl" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: It seems that sipxecs is ignoring my sip registrations from soft phones from the world. Is sipxecs configured to not respond to 5060 from the world? ~Noah Scanned for viruses and content by the Tranet Spam Sentinel service. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net<http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net/> Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net<http://blog.myitdepartment.net/> _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net<http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net/> Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net<http://blog.myitdepartment.net/> _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
