On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 04:56:33 -0400, Michael Picher wrote: > Just to clarify.. > > sipXecs / openUC 4.4 - CentOS or RedHat 5.x > sipXecs / openUC 4.6 - CentOS or RedHat 6.x
I guess that brings up another question. Any problem running sipx 4.4 on Centos 6.x? The problem I'm having is that I can't get Centos 6.x to install on a server I wanted to send out for hosting. If I send a Centos 5.8 server off, then I'll have to replace the server at some point to run sipx 4.6. Or, I need to buy another server where I can install Centos 6.x on it but then I'd either have to send in replacement drives later or, be able to upgrade from sipx 4.4 to 4.6 from remote. Mike > Thanks, > Mike > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:10 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I was... afraid of that... but appreciate the reply. Thanks very much. >> > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:03:44 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: >> For sipx 4.4, 5.8 is used. I am not aware sipx 4.4 is packaged for centos >> 6.0 yet (not sure if it will be). For the dev version and upcoming 4.6 >> release, it will be packaged for the latest centos 6.x (6.2 right now), so >> "going forward beyond sipx 4.4, centos 6.2 will likely be the minimum for >> you. >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:54 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> What's the best version of Centos to use for installing sipx onto later? >> I have a machine that simply won't allow 6.2 to install but thought I read >> that sipx isn't at 6.x anyhow. >> >> Mike >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
