Joegen, I don't mind at all. I've got a couple of servers with the patch already applied. I'll point my new "DOS generator" at those and watch for a few days. ;)
-- Sent from my iPhone appendage On Jun 21, 2012, at 12:50, Joegen Baclor <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/21/2012 10:34 PM, andrewpitman wrote: >> >> Okay, I ran two versions of the Perl script against my test >> server for a few hours last night, both of which loop and >> send the crlf keepalive messages as fast as they could be >> sent. One was sending UDP and the other TCP. I didn't >> manage to get proxy to stop responding to registration >> requests, but the CPU was pegged at about 125% on this dual >> proc VM. I actually managed to fill up my /var filesystem >> with all the junk going to sipXproxy.log, but didn't manage >> to bring forth the issue... > Then it is not the issue. However, that perl script just became a DOS attack > tool against sipx so we need to accept the patch just to prevent what you > have done from happening. Even if the patch did not really solve your issue, > would you mind applying it and see if you can fill up /var/ folder with the > patch active? > > Regarding the freezing issue, I'm gonna have to look again. If you have a > hunch where I should be looking at, let me know. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
