Anyone able to reach it?
Sent from my twiddling thumbs.
Joegen Baclor <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 06/21/2012 10:34 PM, andrewpitman wrote:
>>
>> Okay, I ran two versions of the Perl script against my test
>> server for a few hours last night, both of which loop and
>> send the crlf keepalive messages as fast as they could be
>> sent. One was sending UDP and the other TCP. I didn't
>> manage to get proxy to stop responding to registration
>> requests, but the CPU was pegged at about 125% on this dual
>> proc VM. I actually managed to fill up my /var filesystem
>> with all the junk going to sipXproxy.log, but didn't manage
>> to bring forth the issue...
>
>
>Hi Andrew,
>
>Yes you have a point. Modifying the for loop to something like below
>should cover the situation you have pointed out
>
>int crlfCount = 0;
>for (int i = 0; i< res; i++)
>{
> if (readBuffer(i) == '\r' || readBuffer(i) == '\n')
> {
> crlfCount+++;
> } else
> {
> break;
> }
>}
>
>If you can generate your own rpms, feel free to modify and attach the patch to
>the tracker. If you are not setup to build rpms, let me know, I'll compile a
>new RPM withi this change. However, you will ahve to point your repo to stage
>because there has been changes to some sipXtackLib header components recently
>that would mean you need to update all c++ components that links to
>sipxtacklib.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>sipx-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
